I read this in the jackit-devel list archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9639236&forum_id=3040 I have an Athlon 64-X2 machine, which I'd intended to use at the main machine in my studio. I also have a Celeron machine, which is still in use, having started out as my proof-of-concept for a Linux studio box. One person commented that with their 64-X2 machine, that a larger period size, 256 versus 128, seems better. This is generally true for avoiding xruns. I'm wondering, is an even larger period size 1K or 2K going to make a 64-X2 machine usable. I primarily use ardour, rosegarden4, and audacity for my audio work. What factors impact the timing problem that I might exploit to minimize it? I'm not too adverse to trying newer versions of a kernel and jack. Right now I'm running kernel 2.6.12 jackit 0.100.1. I remember something about there being a pervasive udev change starting in the 2.6.15 kernel. I'd like to stay under that rev., if that's true. Related to this is that I'd like to retire my 200MHz Pentium I machine in our office - 10 years old this month. Would you recommend avoiding the 64-X2 machine for now with my audio work (OK, so it's play)? If so, then I'll keep using the Celeron for music, and move the 64-X2 into the office. We'll be able to compose emails faster than anyone on the block; sigh. It sounds like I really just need to be patient and let the kernel & jack development teams sort this all out. But, if I can make some adjustments and get useful results, then I'd move that direction. Thanks.... P.S.: If you think I should subscribe to jackit-devel and take my question there, then I'll do that. -- Kevin
