On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:12 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 14:03 -0800, thewade wrote: > > Quoting Carlo Capocasa <capocasa@xxxxxxx>: > > > > > XFCE, the shining star among all linux desktops, with audio menu open. > > > > > > http://xthost.info/capocasa/xfce4audio.png > > > > > > Carlo > > > > > > > How does this do for processing overhead? > > The "processing overhead" of one desktop environment vs. another is > negligible on a modern system. On a correctly set up system with > properly written RT apps the desktop won't be able to interfere with the > RT stuff anyway. > This may be true as far as CPU use is concerned but how about I/O? If your desktop or background processes start doing I/O and you need the disk I believe that may cause you some problems. I/O requests will swap you out of the CPU but at the lowest level can you interrupt an I/O process that is going to disk? I do know from experience that I have far fewer xruns running fluxbox than I do with KDE. I have done recording using both and if I'm doing fairly heavy disk I/O (say recording 8-10 tracks) I don't have as many problems with fluxbox. -- Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner The Fuzzy Dice http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/fuzzy.html "As we enjoy great advantages from the invention of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." Benjamin Franklin, on declining patents offered by the governor of Pennsylvania for his "Pennsylvania Fireplace", c. 1744
