I love Ubuntu for other people, although I'm still a Debian user by force of habit. One of the problems I can see with using released Ubuntu for audio is that you can get up to six months behind, and what you have for those six months is whatever was in debian unstable at the time, which you'd better hope wasn't broken. This is the case for anything non-mainstream that you have to get from universe and that certainly includes audio work. If you're willing to build from source of course this is less of a concern. If you're deb savvy you can but a debian testing/unstable deb-src line in there and that way you can usually get testing/unstable packages without messing things up. The good news of course is that you're never more than 6 months behind using released software. :-) Most of us Debian users are tracking testing or unstable and although we get teased relentlessly about ice ages and ice skating in hell, being six months behind just feels awkward. And in both cases, much of the quality debian packages available for debian and ubuntu comes from the hard work of the demudi team. I've been doing audio on debian since before demudi rolled around, and I've helped out on a few packages, and let me tell you the difference they've made is tremendous. On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 at 15:20 -0800, Jon Hoskins wrote: > Hey all, thought I would share some of my recent discoveries: > > As demudi 1.2.1 has been lacking a kernel source for awhile and demudi > 1.30rc1 refuses to boot on my new hardware I've had to seek alternatives. > > After reading several threads on using Ubuntu as a music production OS I > decided to give Ubuntu 5.10 'breezy' a shot. Installing "realtime-lsm" > with module-assistant was easy as pie and I got relatively good latency > with the stock kernel, but real improvements came from two things: > > I decided to give Ubuntu 6.04 "Dapper Flight 3" a run and noticed that > #cat /boot/config-2.6.15-4-386 | grep PREEMPT gives CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and > has been the same in all the "dapper" kernels I've tried, something that > was not enabled in the stable "breezy" kernels. Does this mean the ubuntu > guys are looking at releasing a stable kernel with PREEMPT enabled? > > Anyway the second thing I found was using 'rtlimits' instead of > "realtime-lsm". Making use of a small app I found at: > http://www.physics.adelaide.edu.au/~jwoithe/ > > makes assigning realtime access on an app-per-app basis and even > user/group basis a breeze. This combination has lowered my latency *under > load* to 5.8ms in KDE (Kubuntu is what I installed) and I can squeeze > 2.9ms out of it in a very conservative fluxbox or even xfce4 enviroment > with no xruns and less than 10% cpu/dps usage (as reported by qjackctl). > Most of the good sound apps are available in the repositories as well with > the exceptions of Seq24 (conflicting libs) that I easily built from > scratch, Freecycle, which I'm still trying to get to compile correctly, > and Willem's wonderful DSSI packages. > > It looks like Ubuntu might have a stable release on the horizon suitable > for serious audio work! You are more than welcome to check my blog as > well for an up-to-date journal of my ubuntu "studio" experiments and > installed software list: http://oktyabr.blogspot.com > > Best, > > Jon Hoskins > > > In a world without walls who needs windows or gates? --author unknown > -- Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself. -- Johann Sebastian Bach
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
