On Tue, 06 Sep, 2005 at 07:38PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju spake thus: > >From: Randy Kramer <rhkramer@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > * a GPL license, you are allowing a non-GPL'd fork > > > > * a "commercial license", you are allowing them to compete with you at no > >cost and with no return to you > > And they could make their site completely commercial. It would be > a major job to get the same music back if that happens after many > years. Guess, people should submit their music to as many places > as possible. > > What is the GPL for audio and for photos? Would that be a good idea? http://creativecommons.org/ > I'm thinking a sound effect library and a photo library which could > be used, e.g., in games. I want that a game developer who makes > a sky texture box out of our photos would have to make his texture > box available. > > I also would like to collect photos from all over the world, taken > by volunteers. The license should be good from the volunteer's > viewpoint. Their work should be credited properly. E.g., the sky box > by N.N. based on photo by M.M. > > Juhana -- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)
