Atte Andr? Jensen ha scritto: > Hi > > I just compiled om with lash support. It seams to me that lash is the > hugely missing piece of software that if generally supported would > take linux audio to the next level (to say the least). i just would love it! my typical setup, using both hw & sw synths, is: - qjackctl (with heavy audio & midi patching) :) - seq24 - another seq24 (maybe) - zynaddsubfx - hydrogen - jack-rack - ardour except for ardour, which is for the recording stage, re-creating the last setup of a project is a so-called pain-in-the-ass... > Also what's the general atitude amongs developers towards lash? Should > we start lobbying for the developers our pet software to implement > lash support? i think we should... :) -- ciao Federico
