Wolfgang, Shayne, Jorge- Jorge wrote-- >its a great idea....I'm a "no musician" sound maker, don't know if i >coud join, but there are 3 things i think should be agreed before >start: No, you are already participating, amigo. This is an idea that cannot manifest unless a group of people find it worth pursuing. It isn't going to come out of the music industry and so it has to begin with us. >let motif. an abstrat word so everybody sync there minds (like Brian >Eno has done...) it would be beautiful to discover what the word >"love" means for those 4 people playing music. That it means for the 4 >not for each one of theam... and how it grows by the passing time of >jamming... It is nice that you can be so poetic in the midst of all this technical stuff. >roles. depending in the moment i think people shoud be able to have a >rol in the session so that the efford should be comparted. (One does >the beat, and another a synt stuff, and the next moment they could >change the rol, but in every moment they know what is their roles in >the music) You are looking at the social side of net jamming, and I think it's great. I agree that everyone has to have their own place in the music. And it's intruiging to think of different games that could be played in such a jam room. You, Shayne and Wolfgang have each come at this from a different angle and I appreciate hearing from you all. >chating. it may be dificut to make music and type but I have to be >able to say to the other guy, grrreeeeEEEAt beat woooaaaooo eheheheh Definitely a chat. Shayne, are you in North America? Wolfgang is in Deutschland. Jorge, Portugal, wasn't it? Cheers, -Mercury
