[linux-audio-user] Re: AacPlus compared to Ogg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



aacplus does sound great, even at 32kbs bitrate.  It's developed by
Coding Technologies (
http://www.codingtechnologies.com/products/aacPlus.htm ).  There is an
article about it on slate ( http://slate.com/Default.aspx?id=2112548&;
).
about Licensing--
http://www.codingtechnologies.com/licensing/aacplus.htm I actually
send an email inquiry to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and I am waiting
for a reply.
aacplus is an enhanced MPEG4-audio.  it plays in winamp and vlc.  Does
it play in xmms and other linux audio players?  I guess it shoud.!
guerrier 

> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:58:29 -0600
> From: "Steven Clift" <slc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [linux-audio-user] AacPlus compared to Ogg
> To: <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <02cc01c50257$7520eeb0$6500a8c0@PUBLICUS2>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"
> 
> I understand the licensing differences between Ogg and MP3.  What about
> the newer aacPlus?
> 
> The new KCMP is using aacPlus because they claim they can webcast near
> CD-quality with a pretty small stream:
> http://minnesota.publicradio.org/radio/services/thecurrent/
> (It is great!
> 
> I am trying to get them to add Ogg and MP3 to reach more people.
> 
> Steve
> 
> Steven Clift - http://publicus.net - Reply to: clift@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Join DoWire: http://dowire.org
> E-Democracy: http://e-democracy.org
> 
> ------------------------------

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux