[linux-audio-user] Re: Where to put your plugins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2005/12/9, Bill Allen <bwanab+lau@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Another question that might be generic, but I'm asking specifically in
> the case of ardour. Why does one choose to put which plugins pre-fader
> or post-fader. In other words, which plugins work best pre-fader and
> which work best post-fader? Are there general rules that one can apply?
> For example I would think that compression should be pre-fader since it
> wouldn't seem to make sense to be compressing after you've set levels.

As far as I know: Plugins that modify the original sound and where you
(possibly) don't want the original sound to be still there are put
pre-fader, everything else post-fader.
Classic setup seems to be:
 - pre-fader: Gates, Compressors, basicly any kind of dynamics, EQ's,
Chorus/Flanger/etc, DeEsser, Denoiser, some delays, send to monitor
 - post-fader: (either as one effect per channel or send-to-bus)
Reverb, Delay, some choruses...
For example the Jamin-insert in my setup is always pre-fader in the
master-channel...

But there is an even bigger rule than the things listed above:

  If it sounds right, its right!

Keep on rocking,

Arnold

--
visit http://dillenburg.dyndns.org/~arnold/
---
Wenn man mit Raubkopien Bands wie Brosis oder Britney Spears wirklich
verhindern k?nnte, w?rde ich mir noch heute einen Stapel Brenner und
einen Sack Rohlinge kaufen.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux