[linux-audio-user] Specifying the license when posting music?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:56:42PM +0100, tim hall wrote:
> On Sunday 07 August 2005 13:07, David Collins wrote:
> > Some people might not even want their music listened
> > to by anyone except those on the mailing list.
> 
> A lot of stuff posted to the list is WIP - one would normally only license the 
> final release unless you specifically want to invite people into a 
> co-creative process. All stuff to be encouraged, but not assumed.

Is there any precedent that anyone here is aware of for liscencing works
that are perpetually WIP and may have no end goal in sight or even
envisioned?

-- 
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki  |  Systems Administrator
Technical Operations Division  |  Radio Free Asia
2025 M Street, NW  |  Washington, DC 20036  |  202-530-4900
CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any 
unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact
network@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux