Russell Hanaghan wrote: > Esben Stien wrote: > >> Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> >>> it's FREE >>> >> >> >> This code is not free in the sense most of us consider it. Please see >> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html >> >> A more proper word for this code is a gratis proprietary binary. >> >> It's as far away from free software as possible. >> ``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price. >> You should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without >> modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to >> anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other >> things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission. >> >> In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved >> versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of >> the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary >> condition for free software. >> >> >> > Ok ok...So here's clarification....You won't have to pay any money for > this plugin!! > > R~ > You often don't have to pay any money for commercial plug-ins, either. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20050410/90b4659d/signature.bin
