Esben Stien wrote: >Russell Hanaghan <hanaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >>it's FREE >> >> > >This code is not free in the sense most of us consider it. Please see >http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html > >A more proper word for this code is a gratis proprietary binary. > >It's as far away from free software as possible. > >``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price. > >You should be free to redistribute copies, either with or without >modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to >anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other >things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission. > >In order for the freedoms to make changes, and to publish improved >versions, to be meaningful, you must have access to the source code of >the program. Therefore, accessibility of source code is a necessary >condition for free software. > > > Ok ok...So here's clarification....You won't have to pay any money for this plugin!! R~
