On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:55:35PM -0700, Greg Reddin wrote: > --- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am I just a complete nut? (which I'm ready to admit is entirely > > possible ;) ) or does no one else see ecasound as an alternative > > for > > getting work done? it is stable and fairly complete, reasonably > > well > > documented ... it's just different ... Why is it that having a > > "viable > > professional <foo> package" means having a GUI that looks like > > something > > from the commercial world? > Well, if we're going to go there, then we could still use ardour, > right? I mean ardour is MVC and has a lib and GUI, right? So > couldn't we put some other GUI (or non-gui interface) on top of > ardour-lib and use that? Sure, there is the ardour-ksi text mode interface. It's fallen a bit behind the main development, but perhaps is not totally unrecoverable. -Eric Rz.
