Greg Reddin writes: > --- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am I just a complete nut? (which I'm ready to admit is entirely > > possible ;) ) or does no one else see ecasound as an alternative > > for > > getting work done? it is stable and fairly complete, reasonably > > well > > documented ... it's just different ... Why is it that having a > > "viable > > professional <foo> package" means having a GUI that looks like > > something > > from the commercial world? The need for scrubbing, I suppose. > > Well, if we're going to go there, then we could still use ardour, > right? I mean ardour is MVC and has a lib and GUI, right? So > couldn't we put some other GUI (or non-gui interface) on top of > ardour-lib and use that? I fervently hope for this. Particularly for a choice of GTK 2 (or the forthcoming QT4 -- but that's rather far afield). The accessibility support that comes in the box with GTK now would not only make it a viable option for the eyes-free user like me, but would provide all kinds of percs--like everything you might need to script, etc. It would certainly also obviate any need to update Ardour KS (which was a noble thought but doomed from the start to go out of sync). I guess I'm trying to make everyone aware that the ATK choice matters from the U-I point of view. > > Greg > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail -- Janina Sajka, Chair Accessibility Workgroup Free Standards Group (FSG) janina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: +1 202.494.7040
