[linux-audio-user] merging multimedia patches into the Linux kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



See this discussion on kerneltrap.org:

http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3429

Quoting Con Kolivas:
"Last time I posted this patch to lkml [the Linux kernel mailing list]
almost noone responded on list to say it helped their workload, which is
why it was never taken seriously by akpm. Strangely, once again, noone
seems to have anything good to say about it in the formal confines of
lkml so the list (and myself) will believe it is not worth pursuing."

I think Con is right. I think the core Linux kernel developers are
really not aware that the vanilla kernel is not appropriate for
multimedia work. And that's because no one told them.

As a result, i started a thread on the linux-kernel mailing list (named
"desktop and multimedia as an afterthought?") in which i try to describe
the issues with the Linux kernel on multimedia systems.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108965898400007&r=1&w=2

Please subscribe to LKML and reply to the thread. You can subscribe
here:

http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

It looks like the kernel people want "numbers". I.e., to quote Denis
Vlasenko:

"Hi. I tested patches X,Y and Z. X have latency spikes of NN ms. Y does
not have 'em, but kernel compile time have gone up by MM mins. Z does
not have latency spikes _and_ do not have performance regression like Y.
I am willling to test more patches."

But i suspect any kind of informative and objective report would be
fine.

Thank you.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux