[linux-audio-user] Re: Some music made with Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What I really, really miss in Linux audio/midi wise, are apps that plug-in
to the host sequencer which would be Muse, Rosegarden right now. Using
Reaktor in Sonar, which I've been playing with this winter, is so
convienent.  You can have any number of Reaktor ensembles as synths or fx
all plugged into your piece, and every time you open that document up, every
little detail is restored.  I don't understand why there isn't a Ladspa
synth building application.  Also the soft-synth scene in Rosegarden/Muse is
extremely weak if its there at all, (Fluid)?.
Ken

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Troxler" <lt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "A list for linux audio users" <linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Some music made with Linux


> On Thursday 19 February 2004 21:39, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 17:38, Larry Troxler wrote:
> > > I would say that there are more tools for MIDI processing in Linux
then
> > > in Windows. In fact, that's what drove me to move to linux many years
> > > ago. Common Music, PD, Csound, KeyKit all come to mind.
> > >
> > > Understandably, you're probably lamenting the lack of an out-of-box
> > > equivalent of whatever it is that Ntonyx does, more then a supposed
lack
> > > lack of MIDI post-processing apps in Linux, of which there are a great
> > > many.
> > >
> > > Larry Troxler
> >
> > ???????
> > Isn't what one thing does infinitely more important than how many things
> > can be put in a list?
> > ???????
>
> In some ways and to some people, yes. I didn't say there was anything
wrong
> with that :-). You have this one particular MIDI processing app that does
> what you like, and you don't care about flexibility or the ability to do
> other types of MIDI processing that you dream up. You just want to get the
> job done without having to devise the algorithms yourself. You'd rather
spend
> the time making music. That's fine; it's nice to have something out of the
> box that does the job.
>
> I only commented to make it clear that there are plenty of applications in
> Linux that let you post-process MIDI.
>
> >
> > I don't even understand comments like this.
> >
> You don't understand, or you don't agree? ;-)
>
> > Sorry, but with best regards,
> > Mark
>
> Same here!
>
> Larry
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux