On Thursday 19 February 2004 21:39, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 17:38, Larry Troxler wrote: > > I would say that there are more tools for MIDI processing in Linux then > > in Windows. In fact, that's what drove me to move to linux many years > > ago. Common Music, PD, Csound, KeyKit all come to mind. > > > > Understandably, you're probably lamenting the lack of an out-of-box > > equivalent of whatever it is that Ntonyx does, more then a supposed lack > > lack of MIDI post-processing apps in Linux, of which there are a great > > many. > > > > Larry Troxler > > ??????? > Isn't what one thing does infinitely more important than how many things > can be put in a list? > ??????? In some ways and to some people, yes. I didn't say there was anything wrong with that :-). You have this one particular MIDI processing app that does what you like, and you don't care about flexibility or the ability to do other types of MIDI processing that you dream up. You just want to get the job done without having to devise the algorithms yourself. You'd rather spend the time making music. That's fine; it's nice to have something out of the box that does the job. I only commented to make it clear that there are plenty of applications in Linux that let you post-process MIDI. > > I don't even understand comments like this. > You don't understand, or you don't agree? ;-) > Sorry, but with best regards, > Mark Same here! Larry