[linux-audio-user] I need long latency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:05:03 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The aim is: to capture some source using JACK. So, latency
> is not significant here.
> 
> The question is: which case to prefer for jack server settings -
>  
>   2048 frames/period and 4 periods/buffer,
>                   or
>   4096 frames/period and 2 periods/buffer?
> 
> Or - are these cases equivalent (buffer size has the same size)?

They will have the same latency IIUC, but the 2048x4 case will cause more
latency jitter. If you just recording and not doing anything interactive
that wont matter, so do wichever makes your card happies and causes least
load.

- Steve

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux