On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:34:30 +1000, Mark Constable wrote: > On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:51 am, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > > ... > > well, personally i like the reply-to, and imho that's exactly what > > it's for. we've had this discussion a couple times iirc. but then, > > if you want to vote again, be my guest. > > Or advise people with a problem with the Reply-To > setting, either way, to use Kmail from KDE 3.2 as > it now has an extra "Reply To Mailing-List" option > that works "correctly" regardless if a Reply-To > header is set or not. Kinda makes it a non-issue. Mutt has that too, but its only a non-issue if you remeber to use it :) - Steve
