Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Rob hat gesagt: // Rob wrote: > > >>Ron's contrite response to my original flame suggests to me that >>he got bit by the infamous "reply-to: set to mailing list" >>behavior so many have complained about. > > > I must have missed this complains, but until now I also missed, that > the Reply-to is indeed munged. As this is considered bad practice for > a lot of reasons as well as good practice for about the same number of reasons > (search google for "reply-to munging harmful") search google for "reply-to munging considered useful" :-D > and as > it isn't done on most other lists I'm on, I'd like to ask the admin > (hi, J.) to turn the munging off, if no one else complains. well, personally i like the reply-to, and imho that's exactly what it's for. we've had this discussion a couple times iirc. but then, if you want to vote again, be my guest. -- "I never use EQ, never, never, never. I previously used to use mic positioning but I've even given up on that too." - Jezar on http://www.audiomelody.com J?rn Nettingsmeier Kurf?rstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server) http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)
