Re: Best latency I could expect using USB sound device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:20:01PM +0100, Giso Grimm wrote:
>
>> Based on the measurements I have the impression that more is going on in the
>> USB audio driver than just 1ms packages.
>
> I'd agree.
>
> When I use alsa_delay with 96/2 things are OK for around 10
> seconds, then for another 10 s I get all sorts of weird values,
> and finally a stable value that is a few tens of samples higher
> than the original. This stable value is different each time
> the test is run.
>
> For 48/2, I get unstable values for the first 10 seconds, then
> a stable value that is again different each time.
>
> It almost looks as if something tries to adapt to the situation,
> but not in a deterministic way.

Possibly depends on your offset with regard to the timer interrupt when
starting operations?

-- 
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list -- linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-audio-user-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux