Re: Best latency I could expect using USB sound device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 12 Mar 2023, David W. Jones wrote:

On March 12, 2023 1:17:25 PM HST, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

   P  N  delay (ms)
------------------
 256  2  11.369
 192  2   8.702
 128  2   6.035
  96  3   6.702
  48  3   3.702

P < 128 required 3 periods buffering.
P < 48 was unstable.

Ciao,

My limited experience with USB audio is that it required 3 periods.

At lower latencies that would be true, as listed above. Note that it is stated periods less than 128 require 3 periods. This is because USB audio does not send periods over it's wire but rather 1ms chunks that have to be assembled into period sized buffers inside the computer. Those 1ms chunks are not synced to the media clock but arbitrary size and timing. By the time the period size reaches 128, there are enough 1ms cycles involved that two period buffers work fine because they are an artificial construct anyway. I am sure I have glossed over many details ... Basically, USB was not designed with audio in mind. Also bear in mind that those who design most consumer audio, consider 30ms or less as "low latency". I think even 8 or 16 foot pipes sound much faster than that.

Len

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list -- linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-audio-user-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux