On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:07:06 -0500, Ruth A. Kramer <rhkramer@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hans Fugal wrote: > > http://hans.fugal.net:2500 > > Instiki?! I just found that within the last week and I'm impressed so > far. I've been trying to find documentation to compare the features to > TWiki (I'm pretty sure many are not present), but which might make the > difference to me. It's the first wiki I've found that is as simple to set up as a wiki should be. It's also beautiful (not ugly like so many wikis' default styles). I'm a ruby nut too, so it definitely helps that it's written in ruby. > Also, it's written in Ruby -- and since I want to learn Ruby and > possibly write my own wiki like thing in Ruby, the code is probably > worthy of study. (And, Word style diffs!!) No doubt. Check the recent comp.lang.ruby archives - someone wrote a wiki in just a few lines of ruby. (shameless plug) If you want to pick up some ruby and stay more or less on-topic, play with ladspar. It's a ruby API for hosting LADSPA plugins. > > If you have any pointers to documentation, let me know. (I have > reviewed most (maybe all) of the Instiki wiki pages (don't have the URL > -- it's on a different machine.) http://instiki.org is all I've needed. -- De gustibus non disputandum est.
