Chris Cannam <cannam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, 3 Jun 2018, at 21:08, David Kastrup wrote: >> Because there is a difference between warning people of a danger > > I'm proposing that it is not a danger, but a potential opportunity -- > to get rid of Github. In the same sense that a collapsed roof is not a damage but an opportunity for building a new roof. You are confusing "danger" with "damage". The danger is people investing into an infrastructure not under their control. The damage is when they have to write off part of their investment because of that decision. The longer you keep investing, the larger the damage will be in the end. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
