Re: Arch Wiki Professional_audio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Joe Hartley wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:17:29 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > For professional hard disc recording OTOH it's
> > completely irrelevant as long as you aren't doing software monitoring
> > with your onboard audio for "Professional audio".
> 
> Isn't it important when overdubbing?

Not if you listen to a mix of the reproduced trakcs and the direct
sound (line in) of your instrument. Almost all soundcards allow this,
otherwise use a simple analog mixer for monitoring.

The recorderd track is offset to compensate for latency, Ardour
will do this automagically.

High latency will be a problem if the new track is a software
instrument. But then it's a problem even when just playing
along with other musicians, and not specific to overdubbing.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux