As already pointed out earlier, when you randomly replied off-list, in
my experiences it's easier to use just jackd without anything else [1].
From another off-list reply:
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:44:14 -0400
From: Mac <ussndmac@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: jack, pulse = confusion, at least for me
[snip]
If I understand correctly, if you want system sound to go to jack,
you need a some bridge, a2j, pulse, etc. not matter what jack you
use.
[snip]
Yesno, see
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ apropos a2j
a2j (1) - Wrapper script to simulate a2jmidid's non-DBUS behaviour though a2jmidid actually being...
a2j_control (1) - utility to control a2jmidid daemon
a2jmidi_bridge (1) - static bridge with one ALSA playback port and one JACK MIDI input port
a2jmidid (1) - JACK MIDI daemon for ALSA MIDI
zita-a2j (1) - Use ALSA device as a Jack client, with resampling.
Also consider to take a look at the JACK FAQ:
"How can I play audio from …. via JACK?" - http://www.jackaudio.org/faq/
Regards,
Ralf
[1]
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:02:50 +0100
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Mac <ussndmac@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: jack, pulse = confusion, at least for me
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:56:21 -0400, Mac wrote:
>It's all good...just complicated. :)
Hi,
was it intended to sent the reply off-list?
IMO it's less complicated without jackdbus and pulseaudio. YMMV!
Good luck!
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
