Being the OP (I think) I didn't mean to stir controversy with my questions.
As
has been pointed out there are different ways to get to your preferred
configuration. Be that qjackctl, your own home brew, or some combination
of things.The entire linux audio (generic and pro) and the evolution thereof makes it very difficult to get a clear picture of how it all works and how to get what you want. (I've been a hardware/software engineer for 40 years, messing with jack for the last 10 and still have questions...) To a new comer or someone coming from a different audio platform, it would be hard not to wonder if linux audiophiles aren't trying to make appear you need to be some sort of linux mage to make it work. When in fact, you just need to be a persistent investigator due to it's evolution (and lack of cohesive end user documentation, again, because of it's evolution). Oh, and some background in software, hardware, signal processing, and system configuration doesn't hurt... For those who just want to make music or record something quick...better stick to other platforms and cough up the money that requires.
And, for full disclosure, I use JACK to get to MIDI in ShowControl, the open source theater production control software we are developing. But, I don't have any desire to know more about the internals of jack than I need to to use it as a tool. (but I need to figure out how to get that to start with the preferred sound configuration...so I'll be looking in detail at things like Christopher's jack-select, alas, deeper into the rabbit hole.) ;)
It's all good...just complicated. :)
Regards,
MacOn Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:28:20 +0100, Christopher Arndt wrote:
>Am 13.03.2017 um 20:04 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> DAW users very seldom need jackdbus and other users very seldom need
>> the jack sound server at all.
>
>That's just your opinion, though. I find jackdbus very useful. I often
>switch audio interfaces and JACK's dbus interface makes this a lot
>easier.
That's ridiculous, jackdbus might have advantages for some usage, but
your examples don't cover them.
>I wrote a little desktop systray app to switch JACK configrations via
>dbus (I already announced this here a while ago):
>
>https://github.com/SpotlightKid/jack-select
Selecting a sound card could be done with qjackctl, ardour, by command
line and a lot of other ways, too, when using jackd.
>For auto-connecting JACK audio and MIDI ports, I wrote a little helper
>too:
>
>https://github.com/SpotlightKid/jack-matchmaker
Connections for jackd audio and midi as well as alsa midi could be
stored and restored by e.g. aj-snapshot, too.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT), Len Ovens wrote:
>This is a case where the combination of pulse and jackdbus work quite
>well. Wanting to have a DAW on the screen and be able to, without
>exiting from the DAW, play a u-toob vid...
You don't need pulseaudio to do this, but even if it would require
pulseaudio, it's a corner case.
>There are a number of workflows where a pulse/jack combination is the
>only way to make it work. (radio studio that uses skype for callin or
>interviews comes to mind)
Apart from skype interviews, what are those numerous workflows? How
often do you hear skype interviews on radio? This is a corner case.
Regards,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user