On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > Given in my case I am not concerned with mangling the audio (it is > not intended to be played back, only used to calculate TDOA between > mics), I have no reservations towards resorting to destructive kinds > of processing as long as it improves my ability to identify accurate > TDOA between multiple mics. But earlier: > >>Does anyone have access to an easy to implement (as in code) > >>dereverberation algorithm assuming one has access to the room impulse > >>response? I am looking for a way to clean-up recorded audio signal in > >>order to improve signal clarity (e.g. speech). So now I'm a bit confused... Do you need improved audio, or just signal statistics ??? Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
