On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 02:41:24PM +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2016-06-17 14:23, cbannister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hint: It'll be way more than 16 people, I can think of at least > > 5 people *I know* who are not on facebook .. > > Well, as soon as someone uploads a foto of these 5 people their facial > recognition data is linked in the graph. Every time i give my phone > number to someone who's agreed to let facebook upload its contacts to > the database, i'm a linked to them in the graph. Being "on" facebook > reaches far beyond opening an account. Good point! :( > There might be a non-human readable name attached to my facebook ID, all > that prevents someone from abusing that data (translate my non-human > readable ID to my real name) are moral-barriers. Then we're all doomed!! :( Yeah, it's amazing how little data you need to do that. > On 2016-06-16 23:21, worik wrote: Huh? Isn't it easier to keep track of posts if you reply to each message separately? This could turn out to be a real Dog's Breakfast if worik decides to reply to your message and top posts while doing so. -- The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. -- Malcolm X _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
