On 2016-06-17 14:23, cbannister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hint: It'll be way more than 16 people, I can think of at least > 5 people *I know* who are not on facebook .. Well, as soon as someone uploads a foto of these 5 people their facial recognition data is linked in the graph. Every time i give my phone number to someone who's agreed to let facebook upload its contacts to the database, i'm a linked to them in the graph. Being "on" facebook reaches far beyond opening an account. There might be a non-human readable name attached to my facebook ID, all that prevents someone from abusing that data (translate my non-human readable ID to my real name) are moral-barriers. On 2016-06-16 23:21, worik wrote: > We all should be very parsimonious with what data we > share on social networks (Facebook do not now my correct age, what > gender I am or where I live). We should indeed, however, it is very hard to have control over the data available about us without being totaly off-grid. Using the existing tools to process meta-data, any anonymous communication-medium that has been connected to 10 different identified communication medium, it is possible to deduce with very high accuracy who is behind the anonymous medium. That is to say, inputting inaccurate data in your facebook profile is good for fooling your entourage, not so much for fooling the system. -- Set Sakrecoer _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
