Re: Tilt EQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 5 May 2016 01:18:17 +0200, Alessio Degani wrote:
>I just don't understand why you have to explain those things :)

JFTR, so that people reading the archive, don't get a wrong impression
about EQs. There might be fields were using a tilt EQ might be wanted
(I just don't know such a filed), but it's not a special kind of EQ
doing some magic.

>As a final note, it's not always true that "Changing the level of the 
>frequencies requires to adjust the level of the audio signal". It 
>depends on the needs. If you want to keep constant loudness, or
>constant energy then yes, you have to provide a make-up gain. But
>thats not true in general.

That's true, it could be wanted that the result is more or less loud,
then it was before.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux