|
On 04/05/2016 23:03, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
Yes... it's a possible way of implementing a tilt... and?On Wed, 4 May 2016 22:47:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:On Wed, 4 May 2016 22:00:34 +0200, Alessio Degani wrote:Yes, a tilt EQ can be implemented in different ways, and perhaps the most simple way is the cascade of low + high shelving EQ with the gain control that moves in opposite way with respect to eachother.Did you read Fons response? "That's just a shelf filter and some gain". I don't care about loudness (at the moment).One shelving filter does it all. In addition you anyway need to adjust the loudness impression. One knob can't do it. Please explain it. You have to equal shelving filters, IOW based on the same frequency and the same quality, bandwidth. What is the difference between increasing one filter 1dB (aka +1dB) and decreasing the other one 1dB (aka -1dB) or just using one filter increasing or decreasing 2dB and adjusting the overall volume? Undoubtedly true, but what's the point? You have to give -1 dB before using the +2 dB shelving (again, two knobs). I know the math... I was just asking if there exist a tilt eq! If not, no problem :) I go with shelving. The only difference using a cascade of 2 shelving in place of a gain stage + 1 shelving is in the phase response of the system. So in the 90% of the use case there will be no difference between this two approaches but, again, that's not my original question. Thank you all for the replies! Cheers, -- a. |
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
