On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:55:18PM +0100, Louigi Verona wrote: > Thanks for your feedback, Fons. > > I actually approached it differently. To me the important thing was not to > "quote Fons", but to quote something that I observed as a common sentiment. > Next time I will rephrase it, I have no intention to quote you specifically. But you did, presenting my words in way that made them look hilarious and you audience ask 'who wrote *that* ?!". > You mention that the first part (I assume the first sentence in the > paragraph) is part of the wider discussion. I have read that discussion > and actually have participated in it. You and I know the context, and hence how to understand what I wrote. Your audience doesn't. > You then mention that 'the right ones' is in single quotes. Can you > expand on what those quotes mean? They suggest strongly that I think that something like 'the right ideas' may not even exist. That there may be different and incompatible ways of doing things, and that consequently a developer and users may disagree without either of them being right or wrong. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
