Thanks for your feedback, Fons.
I actually approached it differently. To me the important thing was not to "quote Fons", but to quote something that I observed as a common sentiment. Next time I will rephrase it, I have no intention to quote you specifically.L.V.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:31:18PM +0100, Louigi Verona wrote:
> This is good point about the users and since this was the first time I
> spoke on the topic, I still need to thing some things over and everyone's
> feedback and criticisms are very welcome.
So here's some.
You quoted me twice in the last video.
When you quote someone it is basic courtesy to identify the
author. If you feel you can't do that even for something that
was said in public in the first place, that usually means you
are misrepresenting the author in some way, and know it.
Also when you quote anyone, provide the context. And do it
correctly. When I wrote
> If a developer holds some views that go against those of the
> average user he will have some very good reasons for that. There
> is *no reason at all* to assume that the average user's ideas
> are 'the right ones'.
first that was part of a much wider discussion, and second, the
phrase 'the right ones' was in single quotes. You didn't mention
either.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.com/
http://www.louigiverona.com/
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user