Re: which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:16:15 -0500 (EST)
Karen Lewellen <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Regardless, based on what I do with my
> main computer, the box will be firmly run via ssh TELNET.

Why would you access the machine remotely ? 

Technically speaking there is no such thing as ssh telnet.  These two
are different, ssh being secure, telnet not secure.

> No thoughts between those specific professional audio distributions?

If it is professional, then they will charge for it.  So these are not
professional products per se. 

> If they are interchangeable, then I may seek out avlinux  since my 
> understanding is it is Debian based.

KXStudio is based on Ubuntu packages, which in turn is based on Debian.

> I wanted to keep squeeze because I have a full set of discs for it,
> but the Latency discussion has me wondering since low latency Kernels
> are a must, at least for me, where the pro audio work is concerned.
> Kare

As I have replied a few minutes ago, I have never looked out for
latency except perhaps 12 years ago.  All current kernels are OK to
make music, record projects using plugins, render, etc that is, on a
recent machine.  So it depends on the machine.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux