Re: which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote:

Are you using avlinux, or the other professional audio Linux distribution?
This is not about commands, but about which of these professional packages will produce a command line structure with greatest ease. Once installed that is. I have no Linux box or no functional one at all as of yet.

I use UbuntuStudio which while built for audio use is sometimes not considered Pro enough by some people. However, Studio uses the same kernel as kxstudio which is also Ubuntu based. Kxstudio uses KDE and I have also installed Kubuntu here which also has VTs. Ubuntu is based strongly on Debian on which AVLinux is based. SO pretty similar. I can't imagine a Linux without commandline access. In all the time I have helped people in IRC, I have never had someone be unable to find a terminal when asked to run a command line "something". (some people had to be told what to look for mind you :) ) sh the most basic shell in linux/unix is so much more powerful than windows/dos CMD, that it is unlikely to be abandoned. Much of the linux startup is shell based even with systemd or upstart. Honestly, I think if any Linux was going to not ship shell access, it would be Ubuntu... so If ubuntu has it anything else should too.

Sorry if it came out like a rant, to put things another way, Audio work tends to be more like development than many other uses.


--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux