On 12/12/2015 16:07, Paul Davis wrote: [...] On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Filipe Coelho <falktx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But yeah, since this was something that JACK was not designed for, *all* major clients that exist right now do not support this.
>>
it wasn't just that it "wasn't designed for". we explicitly discussed it and decided that the mere possibility of a changing SR imposed too much of a burden on clients. i still don't know, in retrospect, if this was a correct analysis.
Out of curiosity, what would have been the possible use case(s) for actually supporting this at Jack level?
Lorenzo. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
