On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:38:38 +0000 Adam Sampson <ats@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Len Ovens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > That doesn't make sense (but then neither does 96000). > > Not for audio, but having JACK run at 96000 Hz is quite useful for > low-cost software-defined radio... > Oh come on now. You surely don't expect to get away with that :) Explain.... please. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
