On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:13:17 +0200 Nils Gey <ich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Congratulations. It is very early here and I have read this on my > smartphone and now I had to get up from bed. I have very little > reasons to get up early, but bullshit is one of them. You see, these are the effects of music at 440Hz <g> > I know you quoted this. But why? What is that even supposed to mean? Just to make it short regarding "universal frequencies" and sound. > You can't just (re-)post something like this without saying why 440 > isn't "mathematically consistent". Well, it was a debate and is still is one. 440Hz was adopted in 1955. That does not mean that since that time people can sleep peacefully and never wake up for bullshit, oder ? > Actually, straight to the point: This is nonsense and you shouldn't > perpetuate statements like these uncritically anywhere. Maths could be nonsense, I agree. After all, it could turn out that 1 plus 1 does not equal 2. Nor that C becomes an integer number at all octaves, and one that is consistent with today's binary system, when the tuning is A 432Hz. Instead of replicating the table here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_pitch For the mathematical relation with other cycles and harmonies in many things the universe (after all even the atoms are vibrating), I haven't looked in detail, but since these are, after all, maths, sleep should not be disturbed. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
