On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 13:42, Mark Knecht wrote: > > When I was doing all of this stuff I did some reading from a number > of interesting sites. One of the reasons someone *might* be interested > in XFS over reiserfs is that (and this is totally from memory right now > so I could have it backward) XFS is apparently better tuned for large > files. I would think that, based on my work with Pro Tools where I end > up with large 500MB-2GB wave files all the time, folks primarily running > Audour for audio recording might do better with XFS. That needs to be > verified, but I wouldn't be suprised if it worked out that way. This was my take on it as well. Jan
