> If you're going to rebuild use ext3 instead of ext2 for the root > partition. It's journalled. Use Reiserfs for the data partition. The What is the reason for using two different filesystems here? Is reiserfs more suitable for (audio) data? Personally, I am using xfs (also journalled) for all workstations I install, after having used it successfully on a heavy duty fileserver for more than 2 years. It never gave me any problems, and I have done some nasty tests. Now, I have never run Ardour - on top of my TODO list for a looong time :-), so I can't say how Ardour and xfs play together, but I'd be surprised if there are any problems. Anyway, I would be very much interested to hear if others are using xfs, and how it behaves under heavy multitrack audio IO. Ah, and xfs has a special "realtime" mode. From the kernel configuration: If you say Y here you will be able to mount and use XFS filesystems which contain a realtime subvolume. The realtime subvolume is a separate area of disk space where only file data is stored. The realtime subvolume is designed to provide very deterministic data rates suitable for media streaming applications. which sounds very interesting. BUT!: This feature is unsupported at this time, is not yet fully functional, and may cause serious problems. Serious problems... Hmm, looking at Aaron's mail, he already got enough serious problems even without experimental xfs features... xfs is in kernel 2.6.x, and has been included in 2.4.25 as well. (before that, sgi provides patches) maarten
