Tim Blechmann <TimBlechmann@xxxxxxx> writes: > i had a look at impd, yesterday ... i haven't been able to use it (work > in progress), but i'll definitely have a look at it again, when it's > done ... It may take a while :) > and i'm willing to try to merge the dsp changes between the > devel and the impd branch ... cool :) May I tell Mathieu about it? :) > what i criticize is not _what_ mathieu is doing, but that there is no > roadmap where pd should go. mathieu set up his own roadmap, but probably > his impd and millers future stable releases will go to different > directions ... > there is too little communication between the pd developers ... I agree and it seems that this was the case from the beginning (I started using pd at around version .29). But there seems to be a lot of uncertainty about directions among the developers, although I have not really seen any vigurous disagreements... perhaps it's just lack of any clear future goals? I know I seem to be taking impd's side but I'm not really hooked on it yet. I would just give mathieu a point for the initiative and action in moving towards the realisation. Ok, I think we've move sufficiently off-topic here... Sorry. -- _ __ __ (_)___ Michal Seta / \/ \ _/^ _| / V |_ \ @creazone.32k.org (___/V\___|_|___/ http://www.[creazone]|[noonereceiving].32k.org