> merging audio changes into impd comes. I won't hide the fact that I > like the direction impd is taking. I just hope that the audio side > will not be competely abandoned. But I just discovered recently that > it's more stable with GEM (I had random crashes when going through > examples of pmpd in pd. did not crash once in impd). i had a look at impd, yesterday ... i haven't been able to use it (work in progress), but i'll definitely have a look at it again, when it's done ... and i'm willing to try to merge the dsp changes between the devel and the impd branch ... what i criticize is not _what_ mathieu is doing, but that there is no roadmap where pd should go. mathieu set up his own roadmap, but probably his impd and millers future stable releases will go to different directions ... there is too little communication between the pd developers ... > well, I'm not sure about the 'coordinated' part. However, pd has come > a long way and I'm thankful for that. no one is introducing changes that will harm any changes by the other developers ... cheers... Tim mailto:TimBlechmann@xxxxxx ICQ: 96771783 -- The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes "Awww!" Jack Kerouac
