Michel Dänzer escribio el 22/07/03 02:22: > Probably a GTK bug, not related to this thread. I know, I know... ;) > Which isn't very surprising, as they can use parts of the graphics chip > that we don't have specs for, for one. Sure. Only I remember having installed Mandrake 9.1, and I think video performance was somewhat better. Maybe I am wrong and memory cheats... > Beware that at least the low latency patch needs fiddling with > arch/ppc/config.in to actually be enabled (check with grep LOLAT > .config), and that the preempt patch (which I assume you mean by R. > Love's) actually made things worse for me when I tried it on PPC a while > ago. This may have been fixed in the meantime though. You're right! First line in the patch file says: arch/i386/config.in | 3 + So the patch to the config.in file is only applied automatically for the i386 architecture. Indeed CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL was not in my .config, so should I paste this manually into arch/ppc/config.in? Would this be enough? And about the preempt, patch, well, it seems I still have enough tests to perform so I can spend my holydays safely. > YMMV IJLUW (indeed, just like using Windows!) ;) Regards, Ismael