Michel Dänzer escribio el 21/07/03 13:09: > First of all, you mentioned in another post that you use x11perf to > create X11 stress. Are there also problems with real world apps? "Real world" apps work properly (except for the Gnome theme manager which displays garbage). I only find video performance using Linux a lot lower than using any of the Mac OS's. > Also keep in mind that neither the vanilla 2.4 kernel nor the X server > were designed for low latency. Have you tried the low latency and/or > O(1) scheduler kernel patches, and not running the X server with > negative nice values if you are? Both of those patches (A. Morton and R. Love's ones) were applied to my kernel. I don't know about running the X server with different nice values, which advantage would I get? (I am using gdm as my X session manager). > Last but possibly not least of all, the dmasound driver has been less > prone to dropouts in my experience than the ALSA driver. I should try with pure OSS. Let's not forget that the latency test suite is using the OSS compatibility layer of ALSA. Thanks a lot. Any feedback is still very useful. Regards, Ismael
