On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 03:04, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-14 02:53:41) > > On 13/10/2021 22:50, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-07 09:16:13) > > >> On 07/10/2021 18:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > >>> On Sun 29 Aug 08:47 PDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Now as the common qcom clock controller code has been taught about power > > >>>> domains, stop mentioning mmcx supply as a way to power up the clock > > >>>> controller's gdsc. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> > > >>> Once we merge these, I expect that the boards will start crashing if > > >>> the kernel is booted using an existing DTB? > > >>> > > >>> Is it okay to just merge the first 6 patches in the series now and > > >>> postpone these two until we've had the dts change sitting for a while? > > >> > > >> Sure it is. > > >> > > > > > > What's the merge strategy? It goes through arm-soc? > > > > I think this should go through the clk tree. There is little chance of > > conflicts. > > > > The other thing that concerns me is that we don't have backwards > compat code. If things are going to start crashing that's not very nice. > Is there some way to make it work with old and new DTB for one release > so that we don't have to worry about this problem? I have to admit that I did not check that, but without the patch 7 the dispcc and videocc would be compatible with the old DTB. The 'supply = "mmcx"' would ensure that it is used if it is defined. -- With best wishes Dmitry
