Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8250: stop using mmcx regulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13/10/2021 22:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-07 09:16:13)
On 07/10/2021 18:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Sun 29 Aug 08:47 PDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

Now as the common qcom clock controller code has been taught about power
domains, stop mentioning mmcx supply as a way to power up the clock
controller's gdsc.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Once we merge these, I expect that the boards will start crashing if
the kernel is booted using an existing DTB?

Is it okay to just merge the first 6 patches in the series now and
postpone these two until we've had the dts change sitting for a while?

Sure it is.


What's the merge strategy? It goes through arm-soc?

I think this should go through the clk tree. There is little chance of conflicts.


--
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux