Quoting Fenglin Wu (2021-10-12 21:15:42) > > On 10/13/2021 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Fenglin Wu (2021-09-16 23:32:56) > >> From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> The cleanup_irq() was meant to clear and mask interrupts that were > >> left enabled in the hardware but there was no interrupt handler > >> registered for it. Add an error print when it gets invoked. > > Why? Don't we get the genirq spurious irq message in this scenario? > > Thanks for reviewing the change. > > No, there is no existing message printed out in this special case ( IRQ > fired for not registered interrupt). Ah I see so the irq doesn't have a flow handler? Shouldn't you call handle_bad_irq() in this case so we get a irq descriptor print?
