Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/9] spmi: pmic-arb: add a print in cleanup_irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/13/2021 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Fenglin Wu (2021-09-16 23:32:56)
From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The cleanup_irq() was meant to clear and mask interrupts that were
left enabled in the hardware but there was no interrupt handler
registered for it. Add an error print when it gets invoked.
Why? Don't we get the genirq spurious irq message in this scenario?

Thanks for reviewing the change.

No, there is no existing message printed out in this special case ( IRQ fired for not registered interrupt).

Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux