Hi
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:59 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Philip Chen (2021-09-24 16:54:13)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..7b1034a5a8e9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > +/*
> > + * Google Trogdor dts fragment for the boards with TI sn65dsi86 edp bridge
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC.
> > + */
> > +
> > +&dsi0_out {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&sn65dsi86_in>;
> > + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&edp_brij_i2c {
> > + sn65dsi86_bridge: bridge@2d {
> > + compatible = "ti,sn65dsi86";
> > + reg = <0x2d>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_brij_en>, <&edp_brij_irq>;
>
> Why not move edp_brij_en as well? I think you want to reuse the node
> name for the other bridge, but it doesn't make sense unless that other
> patch is part of this series.
Yes, I posted v2 with the other patch enabling the second source edp bridge.
>
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
> > + interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +
> > + enable-gpios = <&tlmm 104 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
