Quoting Philip Chen (2021-09-24 16:54:13)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7b1034a5a8e9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Google Trogdor dts fragment for the boards with TI sn65dsi86 edp bridge
> + *
> + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC.
> + */
> +
> +&dsi0_out {
> + remote-endpoint = <&sn65dsi86_in>;
> + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> +};
> +
> +&edp_brij_i2c {
> + sn65dsi86_bridge: bridge@2d {
> + compatible = "ti,sn65dsi86";
> + reg = <0x2d>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_brij_en>, <&edp_brij_irq>;
Why not move edp_brij_en as well? I think you want to reuse the node
name for the other bridge, but it doesn't make sense unless that other
patch is part of this series.
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +
> + interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
> + interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + enable-gpios = <&tlmm 104 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
